Volume 23, Issue 1 (Spring 2026)                   bloodj 2026, 23(1): 1-11 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.TMI.REC.1403.002

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ranjbar Kermani F, Amini Kafiabad S. Blood Donation Motivation in Young First-Time Donors: A Population-Based Secondary Analysis Using Self-Regulation of Blood Donation Scale. bloodj 2026; 23 (1) :1-11
URL: http://bloodjournal.ir/article-1-1610-en.html
Abstract:   (195 Views)
A B S T R A C T
Background and Objectives
Given the growing need for blood and blood products, coupled with an aging population and declining number of young donors, understanding the motivations of first-time young donors is essential. Self-Determination Theory distinguishes between different types of motivation, ranging from extrinsic to intrinsic. Research indicates that more intrinsic motivation is associated with the greater intention to donate, actual act of donation and the long-term retention. This study aimed to investigate motivation levels among first-time young blood donors (aged 18-34 years) in the country.
Materials and Methods
This secondary analysis was conducted on first-time young donors aged 18-34 years. Initial sampling was performed using a stratified cluster sampling method with a time-based clustering approach. Provinces served as strata, and working days (30 randomly selected working days from November to December 2024) served as the time clusters. Daily sampling of attendees was carried out using simple random sampling. Among 7187 donors initially enrolled, 573 (7.97%) were first-time young donors with the mean age of 28.79 years (SD=4.11). The samples were divided into three age groups: 18-24, 25-29, and 30-34 years. Due to missing data, multiple imputation was used to impute values for the motivation statements (24 statements). For statistical analysis, a linear mixed-effects regression model was applied using  STATA version 17.
Results
Of the 573 donors, 113 (19.72%), 169 ( 29.49%), and 291 (50.79%) were in the 18-24, 25-29, and 30-34 age groups, respectively. The model indicated that overall, and across all three age subgroups, all levels of motivation, except for amotivation which was considered the reference in the model, were associated with positive and significant regression coefficients (p ≤ 0.001) compared to amotivation. The most significant motivational factor overall was the intrinsic level of motivation (β = 2.99 [95% CI: 2.91-3.16]). This pattern was consistent across all age groups: 18-24 years (β = 3.10 [95% CI: 2.93-3.27]), 25-29 years (β = 3.01 [95% CI: 2.85-3.18]), and 30-34 years (β = 2.93 [95% CI: 2.81-3.06]).
Conclusions  
Within the framework of Self‑Determination Theory, this study found that motivation level 6 (internalized regulation) was the strongest determinant of blood donation motivation among first‑time young donors, consistently across all age subgroups. This suggests that these individuals view blood donation as part of their personal values and identity internalized and aligned with their sense of self- representing humanistic values, altruism, or internalized social responsibility, rather than external rewards, fear of judgment, or external pressure. This finding highlights the need to remove structural and cultural barriers and to strengthen targeted programs based on intrinsic motivation, so that the latent potential of young people actualizes into sustained participation.
Full-Text [PDF 701 kb]   (79 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (28 Views)  
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Blood Transfusion

References
1. Seifried E, Klüter H, Weidmann C, Staudenmaier T, Schrezenmeier H, Henschler R, et al. How much blood is needed? Vox sang. 2011; 100(1): 10-21. [DOI:10.1111/j.1423-0410.2010.01446.x]
2. Romero-Domínguez L, Martín-Santana JD, Sánchez-Medina AJ, Beerli-Palacio A. Lines of scientific research in the study of blood donor behavior from a social marketing perspective. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing. 2019 ; 33(126): 1-52. [DOI:10.1080/10495142.2019.1707741]
3. France CR, France JL, Ysidron DW, Martin CD, Duffy L, Kessler DA, et al. Blood donation motivators and barriers reported by young, first‐time whole blood donors: examining the association of reported motivators and barriers with subsequent donation behavior and potential sex, race, and ethnic group differences. Transfusion. 2022; 62(12): 2539-54. [DOI:10.1111/trf.17162]
4. Ranjbar Kermani F, Amini Kafi-Abad S. Trend of Blood Donation including coronavirus pandemic: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study during 2017-2022 in Iran. Transfus Clin Biol. 2025; 32(3): 272-79. [DOI:10.1016/j.tracli.2025.04.007]
5. France CR, Kowalsky JM, France JL, Himawan LK, Kessler DA, Shaz BH. The blood donor identity survey: a multidimensional measure of blood donor motivations. Transfusion. 2014; 54(8): 2098-105. [DOI:10.1111/trf.12588]
6. Ranjbar Kermani F, Amini Kafi-Abad S, Maghsudlu M, Mousavi Hosseini K, Mohammadali F, Mohammad Jafari A. Development and validation of the self-regulation of blood donation scale for blood donors. Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2024; 46(Suppl 3):299-305. [DOI:10.1016/j.htct.2024.09.2482]
7. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am psychol. 2000; 55(1): 68-78. [DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68]
8. McNeish D. Thanks coefficient alpha, we'll take it from here. Psychol methods. 2018; 23(3):412-33. [DOI:10.1037/met0000144]
9. Maghsudlu M, Nasizadeh S. Iranian blood donors' motivations and their influencing factors. Transfus med. 2011; 21(4): 247-52. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-3148.2011.01077.x]
10. Singh G. Young Donors and Blood donation: Motivations, Challenges, and Strategies for Engagement. (October 18, 2024). 2024. [DOI:10.2139/ssrn.5024655]
11. Petriwskyj AM, Warburton J. Motivations and barriers to volunteering by seniors: A critical review of the literature. The International Journal of Volunteer Administration. 2007; 24(6): 3-25.
12. Bednall TC, Bove LL. Donating blood: a meta-analytic review of self-reported motivators and deterrents. Transfusion medicine reviews. 2011 ;25(4): 317-34. [DOI:10.1016/j.tmrv.2011.04.005]
13. France CR, France JL, Carlson BW, Himawan LK, Stephens KY, Frame‐Brown TA, et al. Fear of blood draws, vasovagal reactions, and retention among high school donors. Transfusion. 2014; 54(3pt2): 918-24. [DOI:10.1111/trf.12368]
14. France CR, France JL, Carlson BW, Frye V, Duffy L, Kessler DA, et al. Applying self-determination theory to the blood donation context: The blood donor competence, autonomy, and relatedness enhancement (Blood Donor CARE) trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2017; 53: 44-51. [DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2016.12.010]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Iranian Blood Transfusion

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb