Volume 11, Issue 4 (winter 2015)                   Sci J Iran Blood Transfus Organ 2015, 11(4): 295-305 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Heydari-keshel S, Rezaei Taviranii M, Ai J, Soleimani M, Ghanbari Z, Baradaran-Rafii A. Isolation and characterization of endometrial mesenchymal stem cells and the evaluation of surface markers in comparison to bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Sci J Iran Blood Transfus Organ 2015; 11 (4) :295-305
URL: http://bloodjournal.ir/article-1-804-en.html
Proteomics Research Center, Faculty of paramedical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Full-Text [PDF 407 kb]   (3168 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (7795 Views)
Full-Text:   (5267 Views)
References :  
  1. Keshel SH, Soleimani M, Tavirani MR, Ebrahimi M, Raeisossadati R, Yasaei H, et al. Evaluation of unrestricted somatic stem cells as a feeder layer to support undifferentiated embryonic stem cells. Mol Reprod Dev 2012; 79(10): 709-18.
  2. Aktas M, Buchheiser A, Houben A, Reimann V, Radke T, Jeltsch K, et al. Good manufacturing practice-grade production of unrestricted somatic stem cell from fresh cord blood. Cytotherapy 2010; 12(3): 338-48.
  3. Amit M, Margulets V, Segev H, Shariki K, Laevsky I, Coleman R, et al. Human feeder layers for human embryonic stem cells. Biol Reprod 2003; 68(6): 2150-6.
  4. Amit M, Shariki C, Margulets V, Itskovitz-Eldor J. Feeder layer-and serum-free culture of human embryonic stem cells. Biol Reprod 2004; 70(3): 837-45.
  5. Carpenter MK, Rosler ES, Fisk GJ, Brandenberger R, Ares X, Miura T, et al. Properties of four human embryonic stem cell lines maintained in a feeder-free culture system. Dev Dyn 2004; 229: 243-58.
  6. Heins N, Englund MC, Sjoblom C, Dahl U, Tonning A, Bergh C, et al. Derivation, characterization, and differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 2004; 22(3): 367-76.
  7. Hovatta O, Mikkola M, Gertow K, Stromberg AM, Inzunza J, Hreinsson J, et al. A culture system using human foreskin fibroblasts as feeder cells allows production of human embryonic stem cells. Hum Reprod 2003; 18(7):1404-9.
  8. Hwang WS, Ryu YJ, Park JH, Park ES, Lee EG, Koo JM, et al. Evidence of a pluripotent human embryonic stem cell line derived from a cloned blastocyst. Science 2004; 303(5664): 1669-74.
  9. Jäger M, Sager M, Knipper A, Degistirici O, Fischer J, Kögler G, et al. In vivo and in vitro bone regeneration from cord blood derived mesenchymal stem cells. Orthopade 2004; 33(12): 1361-72. [Article in German]
  10. Wagner W, Ho AD. Mesenchymal stem cell preparations-comparing apples and oranges. Stem Cell Rev 2007; 3(4): 239-48.
  11. Väänänen HK. Mesenchymal stem cells. Annals of Medicine 2005; 37(7): 469-79.
  12. Tabatabaei FS, Ai J, Jafarzadeh Kashi TS, Khazaei M, Kajbafzadeh AM, Ghanbari Z. Effect of dentine matrix proteins on human endometrial adult stem-like cells: in vitro regeneration of odontoblasts cells. Arch Oral Biol 2013; 58(7): 871-9.
  13. Ai J, Tabatabaei FS, Jafarzadeh Kashi TS. Human Endometrial Adult Stem Cells May Differentiate Into Odontoblast Cells   Hypothesis 2009, 7(1): e6.
  14. Ai J, Tabatabaei FS, Larijani B. A Possible Cell Therapy for Critical Limb Ischemia in Women by Using Endometrial Adult Stem Cells. Med Hypotheses Res 2009; 5: 93-7.
  15. Ai J, Tabatabaei FS, Kajbafzadeh AB. Myogenic potential of human endometrial adult stem cells. Iran J Med Hypotheses Ideas 2009; 3: 25.
 
 
  1. Roufosse CA, Driekze NC, Otto WR, Wright NA. Circuleting mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2004; 36(4): 558-67.
  2. Gargett CE, Masuda H. Adult Stem Cells in the Endometrium. Mol Hum Reprod 2010; 16(11): 818-34.
  3. Spencer TE, Hayashi K, Hu J, Carpenter KD. Comparative developmental biology of the mammalian uterus. Curr Top Dev Biol 2005; 68: 85-122.
  4. Okulicz WC, Ace CI, Scarrell R. Zonal changes in proliferation in the rhesus endometrium during the late secretory phase and menses. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1997; 214(2): 132-8.
  5. Patel AN, Park E, Kuzman M, Benetti F, Silva FJ, Allickson JG. Multipotent menstrual blood stromal stem cells: isolation, characterization, and differentiation. Cell Transplant 2008; 17(3): 303-11.
  6. Gargett CE. Identification and characterization of human endometrial stem/progenitor cells. Aust Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2006; 46(3): 250-3.
  7. Schwab KE, Chan RW, Gargett CE. Putative stem cell activity of human endometrial epithelial and stromal cells during the menstrual cycle. Fertil Steril 2005; 84 Suppl 2: 1124-30.
  8. Schwab KE, Hutchinson P, Gargett CE. Identification of surface markers for prospective isolation of human endometrial stromal colony-forming cells. Hum Reprod 2008; 23(4): 934-43.
  9. Gargett CE. Uterine stem cells: What is the evidence? Hum Reprod Update 2007; 13(1): 87–101.
  10. Padykula HA. Regeneration of the primate uterus: the role of stem cells. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1991; 622: 47-56.
  11. Chan RW, Schwab KE, Gargett CE. Clonogenicity of human endometrial epithelial and stromal cells. Biol Reprod 2004; 70(6): 1738-50.
  12. Gargett CE, Chan RW, Schwab KE. Endometrial stem cells. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2007; 19(4): 377-83.
  13. Dimitrov R, Timeva T, Kyurkchiev D, Stamenova M, Shterev A, Kostova P, et al. Characterization of clonogenic stromal cells isolated from human endometrium. Reproduction 2008; 135(4): 551-8.
  14. Cho NH, Park YK, Kim YT, Yang H, Kim SK. Lifetime expression of stem cell markers in the uterine endometrium. Fertil Steril 2004; 81(2): 403-7.
  15. Lynch L, Golden-Mason L, Eogan M, O'Herlihy C, O'Farrelly C. Cells with haematopoietic stem cell phenotype in adult human endometrium: relevance to infertility? Hum Reprod 2007; 22(4): 919-26.
  16. Esfandiari N, Khazaei M, Nazemian Z, Jolly A, Casper Rf. Angiogenesis following three-dimensional culture of isolated human endometrial stromal cells. International Journal of Fertility and Sterility 2008; 9: 19-22.
  17. Ai J, Azizi E, Shamsian A, Eslami A, Khoshzaban A, Ebrahimi S. The effect of BMP-2 on osteogenic differentiation of human endometrial stem cells. ABM 2013; 12: 16-21.
  18. Jelovsek JE, Maher C, Barber MD. Pelvic organ prolapse. Lancet 2007; 369(9566): 1027-38.
 


 
 
 
 
Sci J Iran Blood Transfus Organ 2015; 11(4): 295-305
 
Original  Article
 

 

Isolation and characterization of endometrial
mesenchymal stem cells and the evaluation of surface
markers in comparison to bone marrow
mesenchymal stem cells
 
Heidari-Keshel S.1, Rezaei Tavirany M.1, Ai J.2, Soleimani M.3, Ghanbari Z.4,
Baradaran-Rafii A.R.5
 
1Proteomics Research Center, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Faculty of Advanced Medical Technologies, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
4Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
5Ophthalmic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
 
Abstract
Background and Objectives
Stem cells are undifferentiated cells able to self-renew as well as to produce more differentiated daughter cells. In this study, stem cells were isolated from the endometrium and were then compared with the mesenchymal stem cells for their nature to be determined.
 
Materials and Methods
Endometrial samples from healthy donors with informed consent after laparoscopy were collected by a gynecologist. The bone marrow samples were aspirated from femur by a hematologist. At least 5 mL of blood was removed and the tissue is at least one square centimeter. After three successive passages, the stem cell surface markers of CD90, CD105, CD146, CD34, CD73, CD44, CD133, and CD45 were analyzed using flowcytometry. The karyotype analysis was also performed for the adherent cells.
 
Results
Endometrial stem cells were successfully isolated from the five samples. Adherent cells in flowcytometric analysis showed the positive expression of surface markers to be CD146: 59.3% , CD105: 98.3%, CD90: 95.8%, CD34: 0.9%, CD 45: 1.1%, CD73: 96%, CD44: 84%, and CD133: 1.4%  while in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells the expression of markers were CD105: 98.6%, CD90: 98.4%, CD34: 0.5%, CD73: 97.9%, CD44: 89.3%, CD146:13%, CD45: 0.3%, and CD133: 0.6%. The morphology of endometrial cells, spindle-like mesenchymal cells, the mode of application, and 44XX karyotype were normal.
 
Conclusions
Stem cells isolated from the endometrial tissue had a heterogeneous population of the cells and high levels of expression of specific surface markers of stem cells especially the mesoderm lineage.
 
Key words: Endometrium, Adult Stem Cells, Flow Cytometry
 
Received:   3 Nov 2013
Accepted: 17 Jun 2014
 
 

 

Correspondence: Rezaei Tavirany M., Protemics Research Center, Faculty of paramedical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences.
Postal Code: 1971653313, Tehran, Iran. Tel: (+9821) 22714248; Fax: (+9821) 22714248
E-mail: tavirany@yahoo.com
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Stem cells
Published: 2014/12/31

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Scientific Journal of Iran Blood Transfus Organ

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb