Volume 16, Issue 3 (Autumn 2019)                   Sci J Iran Blood Transfus Organ 2019, 16(3): 228-239 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ali Akbari Baboukani E, Amirhosseini A. Juridical-legal analysis of consumer's right to blood products on health. Sci J Iran Blood Transfus Organ 2019; 16 (3) :228-239
URL: http://bloodjournal.ir/article-1-1257-en.html
Juridical-legal analysis of consumer's right to blood products on health
E. Ali Akbari Baboukani * , A. Amirhosseini
Keywords: Key words: Blood Safety, Law, Blood Transfusion, Blood Banks
Full-Text [PDF 271 kb]   (1272 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (4002 Views)
Full-Text:   (1264 Views)
    References:
 
 
  1. Shojaeean Kh. Right to health in the light of the constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Tehran: Deputy Legal Director of the Iranian Presidency; 1992. p.309. [Farsi]
  2. Qari SF. Human Rights in the Contemporary World. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University Publication; 1982. p. 501. [Farsi]
  3. Kasraian L, TorabJahromi SA. A motivation survey of blood donation in Shiraz Blood Transfusion Center. Sci J Iran Blood Transfus Organ 2006; 2(6): 259-67. [Article in Farsi]
  4. Abbasi M, Pourfathollah AA, Asghari A. Legal analysis of the ethical code of blood donation and transfusion. Bioethics J 2015; 5(16): 143-82. [Article in Farsi]
  5. Yavari F. Patient’s safety and the Human Rights System. Medical Law Journal 2011; 5(18): 117-31. [Article in Farsi]
  6. Abbasi M, Dehsiri M, Asghari A. Using International Law Approaches in Globalization of Biological Ethics Bioethics J 2012; 2(3): 13-47. [Article in Farsi]
  7. Bagheri Hamed Y, Zakarian Amiri M, Bolori P, Hermidas Bavand D. The Right of health and public health in terms of Fundamental human rights with emphasis on UNESCO document 2030. Medical Law Journal 2018; 12(46): 177-205. [Article in Farsi]
  8. Kokabisaghi F. Justiciability of the Right to Health in International Legal System. Medical Law Journal 2016; 10(37): 33-7. [Article in Farsi]
  9. Zahedi M, Mahmoodi Kordi Z. Protection of Health in the Light of the Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures. Medical Law Journal 2017; 10(39): 79-100. [Article in Farsi]
  10. Abbasi M, Rezaee R, Dehghani G. Concept and situation of the right to health in Iran legal system. Medical  Law  Journal  2014; 8(30): 183-99. [Article in Farsi]
  11. Abbasi M, Rezaie R. Right to health from the perspective of bioethics and human rights. Abstract articles of the National Conference on Law and Ethics in Biotechnology; 2010. p.345. [Farsi]
  12. Alekajbaf H. Concept and situation of Rights to Health under the International Human Rights bills. Medical Law Journal. 2013; 7(24): 139-70. [Article in Farsi]
  13. Zamani SQ. Therapeutic Simulation and the Right to Health in the Field of International Human Rights. Law and Politics Research Journal 2006; 19: 25-40. [Article in Farsi]
  14. Alekajbaf H, Ansariyan M. Impact of unilateral and multilateral sanctions on Iran Perspective on the health rights of the citizens of Iran. Medical Law Journal 2014; 8(29): 11-50. [Article in Farsi]
  15. Eshghi P, Cheraghali A. Legal, social, and economic consequences of transfusion-transmitted infections in Iran and in the world. Sci J Iran Blood ransfus Organ 2010; 6(4): 301-11. [Article in Farsi]
  16. Amirhosseini A, Mobayen H. Analysis of Basis of Civil Responsibility of the State Caused by the Supply of Contaminated Blood in Iranian Legal System and Shiite Jurisprudence. Sci J Iran Blood Transfus Organ 2017; 14(4): 355-66. [Article in Farsi]
  17. Parsapoor A, Bagheri A, Larijani B. Review of revolution of patient’s right charter. IJME 2010; 3(1 and 2): 39-47. [Article in Farsi]
  18. Ahmad Khan Beigi Samaneh. Report of the Evaluation of Human and Human Rights Safeguards of the United States and Europe against Iran, Bureau of Political Studies, Foreign Policy Group, Parliamentary Research Center; 2011. p.83. [Farsi]
  19. Shayegan F. United Nations Security Council and the concept of international peace and security under the supervision of Jamshid Momtaz. Tehran: Publication of the Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran; 2001. p.57. [Farsi]
  20. Shahbazi A. Validity of the 1955 Covenant of Conduct, and Ability to Reconciliation in the Interrelation between the IRI and the United States. International Law Quarterly 2011; 44: 55-72. [Article in Farsi]
  21. Mehrpour H. International Human Rights System. Tehran: Ettelaat Publications; 2006. p.76. [Farsi]
  22. Yazdanfam M. International Sanctions and the Islamic Republic of Iran's National Security. Strategic Studies J 2007; 9(34): 789-821. [Article in Farsi]
  23. Nasiri M. The patient’s rights in using blood products. Medical Law Journal 2014; 8(28): 105-15. [Article in Farsi]
  24. Abbasi B. Human Rights and fundamental freedoms. Vol 1. Tehran: Dadgostar Publishing. p.371. [Farsi]
  25. Zamani SQ. Therapeutic Simulation and Right to Health in the Field of International Human Rights. Quarterly Journal of Law and Politics 2006; 19: 25-40. [Article in Farsi]
  26. Mohaghegh Damad SM. Ghavaede Fegh’h(1). Tehran: Islamic Sciences Publishing; 2009. p. 3. [Farsi]
  27. Mousavi Khoi, Abolghasem S. Mesbah Al-Bukhayeh, Daraluzov's Publishing House Al-Martazovayyeh. 2nd ed. 2018; p. 5. [Farsi]
  28. Moosavi  Khomeini   SR.  Tahrir  al - Wasila.   Tehran: Imam Khomeini Publication; 2000. p.709. [Farsi]
  29. Karkhi Ali ibn Hussein, Mohaghegh Th. Jami al-Majasid Fi Description Al-Qawa'ad. Qom: Al-'Abbat Publication; 2008. p.8. [Farsi]
  30. Mohaghegh Damad SM. Invincible Rule, Criticism of Disclosure Warning, Legal Quarterly of the Judiciary. p.541. [Farsi]
  31. Maki al-Amli MM. Al-Lahemaa Al-Dashqiyah, Dar al-Ulum. Beirut; 2018. p.663. [Farsi]
  32. Rohani MS. Jurisprudence of Al-Sadeq, Dar al-Zawa al-Martazuj. Beirut; 2017. p.827. [Farsi]
  33. Elsan M, Amoshasfand J, Dadkia M, Ajorloo H. A Comparative Study of Safety Commitment and Civil Responsibility toward Toys. Journal of Private Law 1993; 24. [Article in Farsi]
  34. Sabzevari Seyyed Abdul Ali. Al-Fahlah al-Akkam. Isfahan: Sadr Madhavi School. p.274. [Farsi]
  35. Har al-Amli Muhammad ibn Hasan. Waziel Al-Shi'a Eli Tanqih Issa al-Sharia, Dar al-Haya al-'Arta al-Arabi. Beirut; 2006. p. 10. [Farsi]
  36. Ansari Sheikh Morteza, Sheikh Ansari. Al-Mekhasb Book. Kayarat Section. 4th International Congress of Commemoration of Sheikh Ansari Rah.Qom; 2012. p. 27. [Farsi]
  37. Ansari, Sheikh Morteza. Mashbou's Accessories. Razalah Nahrar, Daralzova Al-Martazouyeh. Beirut; 2016. P. 73. [Farsi]
  38. Khorasani Mohammad Kazem. Kofa Al-Asal, Al-Al-Bait A. Qom; 2009; p. 49. [Farsi]
  39. Moosavi Khomeini Seyyed Ruhollah. The Institute for the Setting up and Publication of Imam Khomeini Reza. Qom. p. 75. [Farsi]
  40. Hosseini Sistani SA. Lahrir and Lazdarar. The Grand Ayatullah Sistani School. Qom; 2014. p.7. [Farsi]
  41. Najafi Khansari Sheikh Mousa. Allah's Rule. Isfahan; 2010. p. 19. [Farsi]
  42. Naraghi Ahmad bin Mohammad Mehdi. Aveed al-Ayyam, Maktabah al-A'lam al-Islami. Qom; 2017. p.14. [Farsi]
  43. Doebbler  Curties FJ. Introduction to International Human Rights Law. Philadelphia: CD Publishing; 2006. p.43.
  44. Khan Bhadur Khan. The World of Islam. Proceeding of Third World Congress on Religious Liberty. International Religious Liberty Association Press. 1989; p. 57. Constitution of Iranian Blood Transfusion Organization; 1984. [Farsi]
  45. Mayer AE. Islam and Human Rights: Tradition and Politics. Washington D.C: Routledge. 1999; p. 5.
  46. Nardin T. Legal Positivism as a Theory of International Society. In: Mapel DR, Nardin T. International Society: Diverse Ethical Perspectives. USA: Princeton University Press; 1998. p. 197.
  47. Sachedina AA. The Islamic Roots of Democratic Pluralism. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 81.
  48. Carson JL, Grossman BJ, Kleinman S, Tinmouth AT, Marques MB, Fung MK, et al. Red blood cell transfusion: a clinical practice guideline from the AABB*. Ann Intern Med 2012; 157(1): 49-58. 
  49. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR), General Comment No.14, The Right to the Highest  Attainable  Standard  of   Health (11   August 2000). p. 501.
  50. Davidson N. US Secondary Sanctions: the U.K and EU Response, Stetson Law Review. Vol xxvll; 2009.
  51. Jin W, Honggang W.  The Iran Nuclear Issue In Sino- US Relation. Contemporary International Relation, 2008; 17(5): p. 63.
 
 
 
Sci J Iran Blood Transfus Organ 2019;16 (3): 228-239
 
Original Article
 
 
 

 

Juridical-legal analysis of consumer's right to blood
products on health
 
Ali Akbari Baboukani E.1, Amirhosseini A.2
 
 
 
1Faculty of Ahl Al-Bayat, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
2Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
 
 
 
Abstract
Background and Objectives
One of the most fundamental rights of consumers of blood products should be the right to health, according to which the right should be recognized by the Blood Transfusion Organization and all necessary measures to collect healthy and safe blood to the consumer. The main purpose is to establish relationships between consumers of blood products and explain the various aspects of their right to health as their most fundamental right.
 
Materials and Methods
This descriptive-analytical study is based on library analysis of legal regulations and jurisprudence. Therefore, the present study did not have a definite sampling because of its qualitative nature.
 
Results
This right is supported by jurisprudential rules such as the rule of no-harm, casuality and loss, and there are precise enforcement guarantees in jurisprudence that can serve as a general basis for blood transfusion and blood products, and in Iranian law as well. The right basis is found, and this right is specifically mentioned in the Statute of the Organization and in the Executive By-Law of the Activities of Blood Banks and Blood Consumer Centers.
 
Conclusions 
Ultimately, about the consumer of blood products, the right to health has been acknowledged as the institution of blood monitoring and care. According to the Hemovigilance Division, the Blood Quality Assurance Division fulfills this obligation as well as the legislator responsible for blood bank. There have also been commitments to the need for healthy blood, which affirm the respect for the right of consumer of blood products to the right to health.
Key words: Blood Safety, Law, Blood Transfusion, Blood Banks
 
 
 
 
 
Received:  16 Apr 2019
Accepted: 26 Jun 2019
 
 

Correspondence: Ali Akbari Baboukani E., PhD in Islamic Law  and Jurisprudence. Faculty of Ahl Al-Bayat, University of Isfahan.
Postal Code: 8174673441, Isfahan, Iran. Tel: (+9831) 37932170; Fax: (+9831)
E-mail: amin123321@chmail.ir
Type of Study: Research | Subject: MSc in Law and Finance
Published: 2019/10/2
Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA
Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Scientific Journal of Iran Blood Transfus Organ

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb