Hashemi A. The domain of civil liability. 1st ed. Tehran: Imam Sadeq University Publication; 2010. p. 11. [Persian]
Ashtari M. [Civil Responsibility]. 1st ed. Tehran: Hoghoghdan Publication; 1996. p. 19.
Mazeaud Henri. Lessons in civil law Volume II, New license, second year: Obligations, general theory, property, right of property and its dismemberments. Paris: Montchrestien; 1956. p. 374. [French]
Bahrami Ahmadi H. Civil responsibility. 1st ed. Tehran: Mizan Publication; 2009. p. 28, 40-67. [Persian]
Hossein Abadi A. Review and analysis of Article 7 of the Civil Liability Act. Theology and Law; 2006. p. 4. [Persian]
Tajmiri A. Civil responsibility. 1st ed. Tehran: Afarineh Publication; 1996. p. 16. [Persian]
Yazdanian A. Civil law. The scope of civil liability. 1st ed. Tehran: Adabestan Publication; 2000. p. 37.
Le Tourneau Ph. La responsabilité civile, 3e éd., Paris: Dalloz; 1982, p. 10.
Strack B. Droit Civil: Obligation. Paris: Libraires Technique; 1972. p. 27.
Katouzian N. Non-contractual obligations, Indemnity, Civil liability. 6th ed. Tehran: Tehran University Publication; 2007. p. 179-213, 151, 161, 220. [Persian]
Safaei H, Rahimi H. Civil liability (Non-contractual obligations). 1st ed. Tehran: Samt Publication; 2010. p. 66-87. [Persian]
Barikloo A. Civil liability. 1st ed. Tehran: Mizan
Publication; 2007. p. 43-55. [Persian]
Navaei M. Liability due to illegitimate payment. 1st ed. Qom: Boostan Ketab Publication; 2009. p. 53. [Persian]
Qasemzade M. Obligations and civil liability without contract. 7th ed. Tehran: Mizan Publication; 1999. p. 29. [Persian]
Adib M. [Principal of Civil liability]. 2nd ed. Tehran: Miazn Publication; 2006. p. 56.
Ansari M. Ketab Al-Makaseb. 2nd ed. Qom: Religious Press Institute; 2003. p. 277. [Persian]
Araqi Z. La zarar and La zerar rule. Qom: Islamic Media Office; 1997. p. 137. [Arabic]
Mousavi Bojnordi M. Jurisprudential rules. 3rd ed. Tehran: Orooj Publication; 1980. p. 11-12, 211. [Persian]
Mousavi Khoei A. Misbah Al-Osul. Qom: Society of Seminary Teachers of Qom; 1989. p. 539. [Persian]
Mohaghegh Damad M. Jurisprudential rules, Civil section. 11th ed. Tehran: Islamic Science Publishing Center; 2004. p. 158-64, 120, 178. [Persian]
Salehi Mazandarani M. Civil liability of the State from the point of view of jurisprudence. Journal of Islamic Law 2011; 30: 8.
Kazemi M. Responsibility for contaminated blood transfusion. Law Journal 2008; 37(3): 207-40.
Porghaher Doost Sh. Responsibility for contaminated blood transfusion. Dissertation MSc degrees of private law. Rasht: Islamic Azad University, Rasht branches; 2014. p. 42-54. [Farsi]
Kazemi M; Roshan M, Roozbahani Sh. Civil liability of moral damage caused by AIDS and hepatitis which are transmitted by infected blood through, looking at the case called hemophilia. Medical Law Journal 2014; 30(8): 147-81.
Mohseni R. Civil liability due to contaminated blood transfusion in Iranian law. Dissertation MSc degrees of private law. Tehran: Shahid Bahonar University; 2015. [Farsi]
Tabatabaei Motamani M. Comparative Administrative Law. Tehran: Samt Publication. 2nd ed; 2008. p. 412-4, 387. [Persian]
Seifi J. The Hemophilia Case Study, A New Look at Civil Liability of the State in Iran's Judiciary. Journal of Legal Research 2006; 8: 267-89.
Rostami V, Bahadori Jahromi A. Civil Liability of the State. Islamic Law Research Journal 2009; 29(10): 69-105.
Toosi M. Estebsar. 4th ed. Tehran: Dar-Al-Kotob Elmiye; 1984. p. 872. [Persian]
Mousavi Khoei A. Mabani Takmela Al-Minhaj. Najaf: Adab Press. p. 64. [Persian]
Tabatabei Yazdi M. Al-Orva Al-Vosgha. 1st ed. Qom: Islamic Publishing Foundation; 2002. p. 452-4. [Persian]
Golpayegani M. Dorr Al-Manzood fi Ahkam Al-
Hodood. 1st ed. Qom: Dar Al-fekr; 1993. p. 398. [Arabic]
Jabaei Al-Ameli Z. Masalek Al-Afham. Qom: Al-Mortazavi Press. 1989. p. 108, 162, 375. [Arabic].
Ebn Manzoor M. Lasan Al-Arab. Beirut: Dar Al-Ehya Al-Toras Al-Ararbi; 1987. p. 18. [Arabic]
Mahyar R. Abjadi Dictionary Arabic Farsi. Tehran: Islamic Publishers Office; 1989. p. 11.
Najafi M. Jawaher Al-Kalam. 3rd ed. Qom: Dar Al-Olum Al-Islamiye; 1987. p. 60, 44. [Arabic]
Toosi M. Al-Mabsoot. 2nd ed. Beirut: Al-Maktaba Al-Mortazaviye; 1972. p. 60. [Arabic]
Makarem Shirazi N. Anwar Al-Fighaha. Qom: Ali Ibn Abitalib Institute; 1992. p. 192. [Arabic]
Makarem Shirazi N. Jurisprudential rules. Qom: Ali Ibn Abitalib Institute; 1990. p. 194. [Arabic]
Helli A. Sharaye Al-Islam. 2nd ed. Qom: Ismailiyan; 1987. p. 560. [Arabic]
Mousavi Khoei A. Mustanad Al-Orva Al-Vosgha. Qom: Lotfi Publication; 1986. p. 249. [Arabic]
Hosseini Sistani A. Minhaj Al-Salehin. 1st ed. Qom: Star Publication; 1994. p. 121. [Arabic]
Hosseini Al-Marghi A. Al-Anavin. Qom: Islamic Publishing Foundation; 1996. p. 435. [Arabic]
Mousavi Al-Khomeini. R. Tahrir Al-Vasile. 3rd ed. Tehran: Institute for Publication of Imam Khomeini; 1987. p. 190. [Arabic]
Naraghi A. Avaed Al-Ayyam. 1st ed. Qom: Islamic Advertising Office; 1996. p. 44. [Arabic]
Mousavi Al-Khomeini R. Makaseb Al-Muharrame. 2nd ed. Qom: Ismailiyan Publication; 1989. p. 98. [Arabic]
Emami H. Civil law. 26th ed. Tehran: Islamiye Library; 2006. p. 393, 858. [Persian]
Bahrami Ahmadi H. Jurisprudence rules; Brief of seventy-seven legal legal principles (with comparative study on law). 1st ed. Tehran: Imam Sadeq University Publication; 2009. p. 183-4. [Persian]
Tabatabaei Yazdi M. Annotation on Makaseb. Qom: Ismailiyan Publication; 1958. p. 179. [Arabic]
Rostami V, Sadeghi H, Soleymanian H. Civil liability of road managers for car accidents. Law Journal 2014 3(44): 363-81.
Zargoosh M. Civil liability of the state. Tehran: Mizan Publication; 2010. p. 35, 292. [Persian]
Qasemzade M. The bases of civil responsibility. 5th ed. Tehran: Mizan Publication; 2008. p. 234, 293-4.
Katouzian N. Elementary course of civil law, Legal facts. Tehran: Dadgostar Publication. 1st ed; 2000. p. 109. [Persian]
Badini H, Shabani Kondsari H, Radparvar S. Strict Liability: Foundations and Instances. Comparative Law Review 2012; 1(3): 19-36.
Coleman J. Risks and Wrongs, Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Law. 1st ed. USA: Cambridge University Press. 1992. p. 328-9, 348.
Dari-Mattiacci G, Parisi F. The Economics of Tort Law: A precis. The Elgar Companion to Law and Economics (2nd ed.), Edward Elgar Publishing 2006. George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 03-49.
Katouzian N. Product Liability. 1st ed. Tehran: Tehran
University Publication; 2005. p. 8-9. [Persian]
Shoarian E, Jabbari M. Civil liability of Police. 1st ed. Tabriz: Forouzesh Publication; 2009. p. 22. [Persian]
Ansari B. Fundamentals of Civil Responsibility for Public Water Polluters. 1st ed. Tehran: Andishe Rafi; 2003. p. 66. [Persian]
Forges JM. Responsabilité et indemnisation des préjudices résultant de contamination par transfusion sanguine, Reveu de droit sanitaire et social; 1992. p. 555.
Debouy Ch. La responsabilité de l’administration français du fait de la contamination par le virus du sida. JCP; 1993. p. 31.
Bergès N. La Sécurité des produits sanguins labiles, Gazette du Palais; 2006. no. 161.
Mobayen H. Opposability theory in the basic of civil liability. 1st ed. Tehran: Imam Sadeq University Publication; 2012. p. 197. [Persian]
Sci J Iran Blood Transfus Organ 2018; 14(4): 355-366
Original Article
Analysis of Basis of Civil Responsibility of the State Caused by the Supply of Contaminated Blood in Iranian Legal System and Shiite Jurisprudence
Amirhosseini A.1, Mobayen H.2
1Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran. Iran 2Faculty of Law and Political Science, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
Abstract Background and Objectives
After the transmission of AIDS and hepatitis to some hemophilic patient’s due to infected blood transfusions, the issue of civil liability of the state caused by the supply of blood contaminated in our legal system was seriously raised. The lawyers have mentioned several bases for the civil liability of the state (blood transfusion organization), including the basis of fault, strict liability (breach of safety obligation), equipment defect, and the basis for the not-harm. The purpose of this article is to describe the opposability as the basis for the state's liability in this field.
Materials and Methods
The research method in this paper is an analytical and descriptive method based on the analysis of legal provisions and the views of lawyers and jurists.
Results
The findings of this paper indicate that in the Shiiet jurisprudence, the Etlaf, Tasbib and Ghoror rules have been used to prove the state's responsibility for the supply of contaminated blood, which the Tasbib rule is more in harmony with this issue. In Iranian law, many lawyers have also tried to analyze this responsibility on the basis of strict liability.
Conclusions
The theory of opposability as one of the theories expressed in the basis of civil responsibility, which relies on Shiite jurisprudence, can well justify the responsibility of the state for supply of contaminated blood, without the need to prove the fault or to be liable to the strict liability that is not acceptable in our legal system.
Amirhosseini A, Mobayen H. Analysis of Basis of Civil Responsibility of the State Caused by the Supply of Contaminated Blood in Iranian
Legal System and Shiite Jurisprudence. Sci J Iran Blood Transfus Organ 2017; 14 (4) :355-366 URL: http://bloodjournal.ir/article-1-1113-en.html