Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Hossein pour

Sh Ilbeigi, A Gharehbaghian, A Moghadam, R Dehkhoda, H Sarvi, F Zoghi, A Hossein Pour,
Volume 3, Issue 2 (Summer 2006)
Abstract

  Abstract

  

 Background and Objectives

 High risk and unaware donors embarking on blood donation endanger blood safety. Thus the importance of donors training for providing safe blood is one of the main objectives of IBTO. In this study, we evaluated the awareness of blood donors about safe blood donation among Tabriz blood donors in 1384.

 

 Materials and Methods

 This cross-sectional study was conducted on 1200 literate blood donors who had studied the screening educational materials designed to raise their awareness about safe blood donation in Tabriz . The blood donors were selected using random sampling and a 3-part questionnaire was distributed among them. Part one contained questions about demographic characteristics, part two aimed to evaluate the method the materials were presented, and part three intended to evaluate awareness of donors about safe blood donation. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (version 11.5) and chi-square test.

 

 Results

 97% of blood donors answered the questions designed to evaluate the method the educational materials were presented the answers showed their satisfaction. There was a correlation between educational level of donors and the degree of using educational pamphlets, the degree of their evaluation about the simplicity of materials and their length, and the degree of learning new information about blood safety (p<0.05). 68.8% of blood donors knew that routine screening tests cannot detect a recent infection (window period) and 66.8% were aware of confidential self-exclusion. There was a correlation between the number of donations and awareness of window period and confidential self-exclusion (p<0.05). The most frequent questions receiving incorrect answers and being left unanswered were about window period of transfusion - transmitted diseases and confidential self-exclusion that came out to form 31.2% and 33.2% of the total number of questions respectively. In addition, 51.7% of blood donors thought that the most important factor to ensure safe blood is the laboratory testing rather than consultation with physician.

 

 

 Conclusion

 Since the educational level of blood donors is an important variable in evaluation of the method the educational materials are presented, it should be considered in providing screening educational materials. The results of the study about respondents' awareness of window period and confidential self-exclusion show that these concepts need to be revised in educational pamphlets. Moreover, the sincere collaboration with consulting physician as an important factor to ensure safe blood should be further emphasized .

 

 Key words: Blood donors, Educational materials, Safe blood donors


Dr. V. Mosmer, Dr. A.n. Moghaddam Dizaj Herik , B. Shokuei, S. Dadashi, Dr. M. Asghari Jafarabadi, Dr. Sh. Ardabilizadeh, Dr. A. Hossein Pour, Dr. P. Lotfinejad,
Volume 17, Issue 3 (Autumn 2020)
Abstract

Abstract
Background and Objectives
To encourage women to embark on blood donation, the opinions and factors that impede blood donation should be identified. The purpose of this study was to investigate factors affecting participation of women in blood donation.
 
Materials and Methods
In this cross-sectional study, the questionnaires were completed by 250 female staff of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. Data were analyzed using Pearson correlation, one-way ANOVA and regression analysis.
 
Results
93.6% of people claimed blood donation is a humanitarian act, and 81.2% claimed "anemia" is barrier of blood donation. Regression analysis showed that there was a negative and significant relationship between knowledge and motivating factors that have impact on blood donation (p= 0.003), but barriers score did not show a significant correlation with women participation (p= 0.515). Based on the results of independent T-test, the relationship of marital status was not significant as compared with the knowledge  score (p = 0.834),  with  the  barriers score (p= 0.434), and with that of motivating factors (p = 0.615). Education level has not significantly correlated with the knowledge score (p = 0.510) but there was a significant negative correlation with barriers variable in blood donation (p = 0.17).
 
Conclusions 
According to the results, most of the participants in this study considered fear of anemia and fear of test results as barrier of blood donation. Therefore, establishing basic education and training programs to eliminate the wrong beliefs about blood donation would help encourage women as healthy sources of blood donors.
 
 


Page 1 from 1     

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Scientific Journal of Iran Blood Transfus Organ

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb