[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About us :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
News& Events::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Indexing
                        
..
:: Volume 18, Issue 3 (Autumn 2021) ::
Sci J Iran Blood Transfus Organ 2021, 18(3): 149-160 Back to browse issues page
Evaluation of sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value in viral screening kits of donors of Iran Blood Transfusion Organization in two high-risk and low-risk groups in 1397 to the first half of 1398
ُS. Riyahi , ُS. Amini-Kafiabad , ُِD. Minai Tehrani , M. Maghsudlu , S.M. Alavian
Abstract:   (1927 Views)
Abstract
Background and Objectives
Assessing the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of blood-borne infections detection kits are important indicators in the evaluation and use of the kit.
 
Materials and Methods
The present study is a descriptive study. The sensitivity of the kit was calculated using the panels of Boston Biomedica Company, definite positive samples of Iranian patients, and the specificity and PPV of the kits in two groups of low-risk )1646371) and high-risk (2525). The results were analyzed with descriptive statistics, SPSS 26, and OR statistical test. (p < 0.05)
 
Results
In evaluating Monalisa HBs Ag ULTRA, Bio-Rad, and Genscreen ULTRA HIV Ag/Ab kits, Bio-Rad is even more sensitive than reference kits (Enzygnost HBsAg 6.0, Siemens, HIV Ag/Ab Biomerieux) and in the case of Monalisa Anti-HCV kit PLUS Version 3, Bio-Rad sensitivity was equal to 98.6% of the reference kit (Ortho HCV 3.0 Enhanced SAVE). The results of the specificity evaluation in the high-risk group by three kits of HBs Ag, Anti HCV, and HIV Ag/Ab were 99.56%, 100%, and 99.80%, respectively. The results of the evaluation of PPV in the same three kits in the low-risk group were 41.4%, 31.30%, and 6.07% and in the high-risk group they were reported to be 72.5%, 100% and 37.5%, respectively.
 
Conclusions 
The results of the present study, in addition to the appropriateness of sensitivity and specificity of the studied kits, showed a significant difference in PPV in communities with different viral prevalence and emphasized the importance of paying attention to prevalence in order to select kits and methods used for viral screening or diagnosis.
Keywords: Predictive Value of Tests, Sensitivity, Specificity
Full-Text [PDF 480 kb]   (779 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (2752 Views)  
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Virology
Published: 2021/10/2
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Riyahi ُ, Amini-Kafiabad ُ, Minai Tehrani ِ, Maghsudlu M, Alavian S. Evaluation of sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value in viral screening kits of donors of Iran Blood Transfusion Organization in two high-risk and low-risk groups in 1397 to the first half of 1398. Sci J Iran Blood Transfus Organ 2021; 18 (3) :149-160
URL: http://bloodjournal.ir/article-1-1412-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 18, Issue 3 (Autumn 2021) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه پژوهشی خون Scientific Journal of Iran Blood Transfus Organ
The Scientific Journal of Iranian Blood Transfusion Organization - Copyright 2006 by IBTO
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 39 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645