[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About us :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Advisory Board
Aims & Scope
Journal News
Articles archive::
All Issues
Current Issue
Articles in press
For Authors::
Submission Instruction
For Reviewers::
Reviewers Section
Subscription::
Subscription Form
News& Events::
Journal News
Contact us::
Contact Information
Contact us
Site Facilities::
Site map
Search contents
Top 10 contents
Inform others
Ethics & Permissions::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Indexing
                        
..
:: Volume 18, Issue 2 (Summer 2021) ::
Sci J Iran Blood Transfus Organ 2021, 18(2): 87-96 Back to browse issues page
Survey on the blood transfusion-related reactions in blood recipients referred to Hamadan hospitals in 2018-2019
F. Amiri , H. Jambbozorg , M. Biglarii , A. Mohammadi , M. Afshari , S.M.R. Seyedi
Keywords: Blood Transfusion, Transfusion reactions, Blood sefety
Full-Text [PDF 497 kb]   (1232 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (1573 Views)
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Blood Transfusion
Published: 2021/07/1
Full-Text:   (4791 Views)
References:
  1. Sullivan MT, Wallace EL. Blood collection and transfusion in the United States in 1999. Transfusion 2005; 45(2): 141-8.
  2. Delaney M, Wendel S, Bercovitz RS, Cid J, Cohn C, Dunbar NM, et al. Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion (BEST) Collaborative. Transfusion reactions: prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Lancet 2016; 388(10061): 2825-36.
  3. Aminiahidashti H, Bozorgi F, Montazer H, Zeinali F, Seyed Jaber SJ. Acute Outcomes of Blood Transfusions in Patients Admitted to Emergency Department. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci 2016; 25 (134): 324-8. [Article in Farsi]
  4. Carson JL, Grossman BJ, Kleinman S, Tinmouth AT, Marques MB, Fung MK, et al. Red blood cell transfusion: a clinical practice guideline from the AABB. Ann Intern Med 2012; 157(1): 49-58.
  5. Goel R, Tobian AAR, Shaz BH. Noninfectious transfusion-associated adverse events and their mitigation strategies. Blood 2019; 133(17): 1831-9.
  6. Clark P, Rennie I, Rawlinson S. Quality improvement report: Effect of a formal education programme on safety of transfusions. BMJ 2001; 323(7321): 1118-20.
  7. Kanemitsu Y. 24-hour system of the blood transfusion services at the university hospital. Rinsho Byori 2003; 51(1): 57-62. [Article in Japanese]
  8. Gardner K, Hoppe C, Mijovic A, Thein SL. How we treat delayed haemolytic transfusion reactions in patients with sickle cell disease. Br J Haematol 2015; 170(6): 745-56.
  9. Sachdev S, Mittal K, Patidar G, Marwaha N, Sharma RR, Duseja AK, et al. Risk Factors for Transfusion Transmissible Infections Elicited on Post Donation Counselling in Blood Donors: Need to Strengthen Pre-donation Counselling. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus 2015; 31(3): 378-84.
  10. Ittah-Desmeulles H, Nguyen L, Moreau C, Garrot H, Bourdillon F. Quality-assessment of the transfusion record in a Paris hospital in 2003. Transfus Clin Biol 2004; 11(4): 192-8. [Article in French]
  11. Suddock JT, Crookston KP. Transfusion Reactions. 2020 Aug 10. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 Jan–. PMID: 29489247.
  12. Timler D, Klepaczka J, Kasielska-Trojan A, Bogusiak K. Analysis of complications after blood components' transfusions. Pol Przegl Chir 2015; 87(4): 166-73.
  13. Frazier SK, Higgins J, Bugajski A, Jones AR, Brown MR. Adverse Reactions to Transfusion of Blood Products and Best Practices for Prevention. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am 2017; 29(3): 271-290.
  14. Ning S, Solh Z, Arnold DM, Morin PA. Premedication for the prevention of nonhemolytic transfusion reactions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transfusion 2019; 59(12): 3609-3616.
  15. Shimmer C, Hamouda K, Ozkur M, Sommer SP, Hain J, Aleksic I, et al. Influence of storage time and amount of red blood cell transfusion on postoperative renal function: an observational cohort study. Heart Lung Vessel 2013; 5(3): 148-57.
  16. Tinmouth A. Reducing the amount of blood transfused by changing clinicians' transfusion practices. Transfusion. 2007;47(2 Suppl):132-5.2013; 5(3): 148-57.
  17. Refaai MA, Blumberg N. The transfusion dilemma--weighing the known and newly proposed risks of blood transfusions against the uncertain benefits. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2013; 27(1): 17-35.
  18. Mohebbifar R, Khosravi S, Moghimi F, Goudarzi M, Pourkarim H, Azad M. Profile of side Effects in Patients Receiving Blood Transfusion from the Perspective of Management Unit. Novel Biomed [Internet]. 2015Oct.28 [cited 2021Feb.3]; 3(4): 200-6. [Article in Farsi]
  19. Sharma DK, Datta S, Gupta A. Study of acute transfusion reactions in a teaching hospital of Sikkim: A hemovigilance initiative. Indian J Pharmacol 2015; 47(4): 370-4.
  20. Bodaghkhan F, Ramzi M, Vazirian S, Ahmadi M, Hajebi Rajabi M, Kohan N, et al. The prevalence of acute blood transfusion reactions in Nemazee Hospital. Sci J Iran Blood Transfus Organ 2014; 11(3): 247-51. [Article in Farsi]
  21. Kato H, Nakayama T, Uruma M, Okuyama Y, Handa M, Tomiyama Y, et al. A retrospective observational study to assess adverse transfusion reactions of patients with and without prior transfusion history. Vox Sang 2015; 108(3): 243-50.
  22. Grandi J and colleagues. Describe the occurrence of immediate transfusion reactions received by the Risk Management Department of Hospital São Paulo. The Scientific Electronic Library Online. 2018; 52: 1-7.
  23. Bakhshi R, Akaberian S, Bahreini M, Mirzaei K, Kiani J. The Effect of Group Counseling on the Quality of Life in Patients with Major Thalassemia Referred to the Thalassemia Treatment Center in Bushehr. PSJ 2018; 16(3): 11-9. [Article in Farsi]
  24. Kasim J, Aldarweesh F, Connor JP. Blood product and laboratory resource wastage in non-severe allergic transfusion reactions: an opportunity for improvement. Transfus Med 2019; 29(5): 338-43.
  25. Timler D, Klepaczka J, Kasielska-Trojan A, Bogusiak K. Analysis of complications after blood components' transfusions. Pol Przegl Chir 2015; 87(4): 166-73.
  26. Dzik WH. Technology for enhanced transfusion safety. Hematology/the Education Program of the American Society of Hematology American Society of Hematology Education Program 2005: 476-82.16.
  27. Ehsani M, Shahgholi E, Sotoudeh K. Transfusion complications due to human error in thalassemic patients. Sci J Iran Blood Transfus Organ 2007; 4(2): 159-62. [Article in Farsi]
  28. Goodnough LT, Panigrahi AK. Blood Transfusion Therapy. Med Clin North Am 2017; 101(2): 431-47.
  1.  
 
 
 
Sci J Iran Blood Transfus Organ 2021;18(2): 87-96
 
 
Original Article
 
 
 
 
 


Survey on the blood transfusion-related reactions in blood recipients referred to Hamadan hospitals in 2018-2019
 
Amiri F.1, Jambozorg H.2, Biglari M.2, Mohammadi A.3,4, Afshari M.2, Seyedi S.M.R.2
 
 
1School of Para Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
2Student Research Committee, Hamadan University of Medical Science, Hamadan, Iran
3Blood Transfusion Research Center, High Institute for Research and Education in Transfusion, Tehran, Iran
4Hamadan Blood Transfusion Center, Hamadan, Iran
 
 
Abstract
Background and Objectives
Blood transfusion like other medical interventions has some complications known as blood transfusion reactions. The record of these reactions is helpful in their management and patients treatments. This study has aimed to evaluate the rate of the reactions due to the transfusion of blood components among blood recipients who have had complications in hospitals of Hamadan.
 
Materials and Methods
In this cross sectional and retrospective study, the data of all 116 completed reports of possible reactions after transfusion of blood and blood components during 2018 and 2019 were inserted in to SPSS software version 16. The Data were analyzed using T-test, Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test. The significance level was determined as p < 0.05.
 
Results
Based on the results, in a specialized blood hospital and four general hospitals, allergic reactions make the most common complication with 63 cases (53.4%) followed by febrile non hemolytic reactions with 28 cases (24.1%). A meaningful correlation was observed between RBC containing blood components and febrile non hemolytic reactions (p = 0.02). 68 patients  (58.6% cases) had a history of transfusion of blood products and 78 patients (67.2%) had no history of blood disease.
 
Conclusions 
Allergic and febrile non hemolytic reactions had the highest prevalence in blood recipients. The administration of products containing RBC was related to febrile non hemolytic reactions of recipients.
 
Key words: Blood Transfusion, Transfusion reactions, Blood sefety
 
 
 
 
 
 
Received:  23 Feb 2021
Accepted: 24 Apr 2021
 
 

Correspondence: Amiri F., PhD of Hematology & Blood Banking. Assistant Professor in Department of  Medical Laboratory Sciences, School of Para Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences.
Postal Code: 6517838741, Hamadan, Iran. Tel: (+9881) 38380109; Fax: (+9881) 38381017
E-mail: f.amiri@umsha.ac.ir
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Amiri F, Jambbozorg H, Biglarii M, Mohammadi A, Afshari M, Seyedi S. Survey on the blood transfusion-related reactions in blood recipients referred to Hamadan hospitals in 2018-2019. Sci J Iran Blood Transfus Organ 2021; 18 (2) :87-96
URL: http://bloodjournal.ir/article-1-1399-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 18, Issue 2 (Summer 2021) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه پژوهشی خون Scientific Journal of Iran Blood Transfus Organ
The Scientific Journal of Iranian Blood Transfusion Organization - Copyright 2006 by IBTO
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.08 seconds with 39 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645