[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About us :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
News& Events::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Ethics & Permissions::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Indexing
                        
..
:: Volume 18, Issue 1 (Spring 2021) ::
Sci J Iran Blood Transfus Organ 2021, 18(1): 36-43 Back to browse issues page
The effectiveness of antibody screening program in improving blood consumption in two hospitals Kosar and Chamran in Shiraz, Iran
L. Kasraian , َA. Afzal , Z. Haghighat
Keywords: Screening, Blood, Hospitals
Full-Text [PDF 287 kb]   (510 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (1571 Views)
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Blood transfusion medicine
Published: 2021/02/28
Full-Text:   (964 Views)
    References:
 
 
  1. Alghamdi S, Gonzalez B, Howard L, Zeichner S, LaPietra A, Rosen G, et al. Reducing blood utilization by implementation of a type-and-screen transfusion policy a single-institution experience. Am J Clin Pathol 2014; 141(6): 892-5.
  2. Aryal S, Shrestha D, Bharadwaj B. Step towards Formulating a Maximum Surgical Blood Ordering Schedule in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Journal of Lumbini Medical College 2016; 4(2): 99-103.
  3. Rehan M. Blood cross-match ordering practices. Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College 2016; 20(3): 222-4.
  4. Thabah R, Sailo L, Bardoloi J, Lanleila M, Lyngdoh N, Yunus M, et al. Maximum Surgical Blood Order Schedule’in a newly set-up tertiary care hospital. Anaesthesia Pain & Intensive Care 2019; 17(1): 28-32.
  5. Akoko LO, Joseph AB. Blood utilization in elective surgery in a tertiary hospital in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Tanzania Journal of Health Research 2015; 17(4): 1-8.
  6. Olawumi HO, Bolaji BO. Blood utilization in elective surgical procedures in Ilorin. Tropical Journal of Health Sciences 2006; 13(1): 15-7.
  7. Sowayan SA. Use of blood in elective surgery: an area of wasted hospital resource. Ann Saudi Med 1994; 14(4): 326-8.
  8. Wang D, Sun J, Solomon SB, Klein HG, Natanson C. Transfusion of older stored blood and risk of death: a meta-analysis. Transfusion 2012; 52(6): 1184-95.
  9. Mann K, Sim I, Ali T, Chong P, Leopold P, Hatrick A, et al. Removing the need for crossmatched blood in elective EVAR. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2012; 43(3): 282-5.
  10. Dexter F, Ledolter J, Davis E, Witkowski TA, Herman JH, Epstein RH. Systematic criteria for type and screen based on procedure's probability of erythrocyte transfusion. Anesthesiology 2012; 116(4): 768-78.
  11. Chow EY. The impact of the type and screen test policy on hospital transfusion practice. Hong Kong Med J 1999; 5(3): 275-9.
  12. Palmer T, Wahr JA, O’Reilly M, Greenfield MLV. Reducing unnecessary cross-matching: a patient-specific blood ordering system is more accurate in predicting who will receive a blood transfusion than the maximum blood ordering system. Anesth Analg 2003; 96(2): 369-75.
  13. Lin JS, Chen YJ, Tzeng CH, Lyou JY, Lee CH. Revisiting of preoperative blood ordering policy--a single institute's experience in Taiwan. J Chin Med Assoc 2006; 69(11): 507-11.
  14. Alavi-Moghaddam M, Bardeh M, Alimohammadi H, Emami H, Hosseini-Zijoud SM. Blood transfusion practice before and after implementation of type and screen protocol in emergency department of a university affiliated hospital in Iran. Emerg Med Int 2014; 2014: 316463.
  15. Klein HG, Anstee DJ. Mollison's blood transfusion in clinical medicine. Philadelphia: John Wiley & Sons; 2014. p. 458-98.
  16. Teremmahi Ardestani M, Golvardi Yazdi MS, Sobhani
    G, Abroushan H, Roonema R. Analyzing ordering schedule of blood and its products in Shahid Mohammadi hospital, Bandar Abbas, Iran. Hormozgan Medical Journal 2015; 19(3): 148-53.
  17. Zewdie K, Genetu A, Mekonnen Y, Worku T, Sahlu A, Gulilalt D. Efficiency of blood utilization in elective surgical patients. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19(1): 804.
  18. Aqmasheh S, Shamsasenjan K. The evaluation of blood crossmatches and blood utilization at university hospitals in Tabriz. Sci J Iran Blood Transfus Organ 2016; 13(4): 259-68. [Article in Farsi]
  19. Obi E, Pughikumo O, Korubo K, Ejele A. Prevalence of clinically significant antibodies in patients undergoing elective surgery in a Nigerian teaching hospital: A case for the type and screen method. Niger J Clin Pract 2020; 23(2): 138-46.
  20. Chapman J, Milkins C, Voak D. The computer crossmatch: a safe alternative to the serological crossmatch. Transfus Med 2000; 10(4): 251-6.
  21. Pathak S, Chandrashekhar M, Wankhede G. Type and screen policy in the blood bank: Is AHG cross-match still required? A study at a multispecialty corporate hospital in India. Asian J Transfus Sci 2011; 5(2): 153-6.
  22. Huang ST, Lair J, Floyd DM, Cole GW. Type and hold system for better blood utilization. Transfusion 1980; 20(6): 725-8.
  23. Aggarwal G, Tiwari AK, Arora D, Dara RC, Acharya DP, Bhardwaj G, et al. Advantages of type and screen policy: Perspective from a developing country! Asian J Transfus Sci 2018; 12(1): 42-5.
  24. Chaudhary R, Agarwal N. Safety of type and screen method compared to conventional antiglobulin crossmatch procedures for compatibility testing in Indian setting. Asian J Transfus Sci 2011; 5(2): 157-9.
  25. Agrawal A. Type and screen policy: Is there any compromise on blood safety? Transfus Apher Sci 2014; 50(2): 271-3.
  26. Lee E, Redman M, Burgess G, Win N. Do patients with autoantibodies or clinically insignificant alloantibodies require an indirect antiglobulin test crossmatch? Transfusion 2007; 47(7): 1290-5.
  27. Alavi-Moghaddam M, Bardeh M, Alimohammadi H, Emami H, Hosseini-Zijoud SM. Blood transfusion practice before and after implementation of type and screen protocol in emergency department of a university affiliated hospital in Iran. Emerg Med Int 2014; 2014(5): 60-8.
  28. Bansal K, Kakkar R. Study of the ratio of cross-matching to transfusion of blood or blood component, ie packed red blood corpuscles to develop good practices for the utilisation of blood. J Evolution Med Dent Sci 2017; 6(35): 2909-14.
  29. Kasraian L, Afsar Z, Shirazi B, Torabi M. The effect of maximum surgical blood ordering on blood utilization in elective surgeries in 23 hospitals of Shiraz, Iran. Sci J Iran Blood Transfus Organ 2019; 16(3): 186-93. [Artcle in Farsi]
 
 
 
 
 
Sci J Iran Blood Transfus Organ 2021;18 (1): 36-43
Original Article
 
 
 
 
 


The effectiveness of antibody screening program in improving blood consumption in two hospitals Kosar and Chamran in Shiraz, Iran
 
Kasraian L.1,2, Afzal A.3, Haghighat Z.4
 
 
1Blood Transfusion Research Center, High Institute for Research and Education in Transfusion Medicine, Tehran, Iran
2Shiraz Blood Transfusion Center, Shiraz, Iran
3Kosar Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
4Chamran Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
 
 
Abstract
Background and Objectives
Only 40-50% of cross-matched blood bags are used for surgeries, which leads to wastage of blood bags. We investigated the effectiveness of antibody screening in improving blood consumption during surgeries.
 
Materials and Methods
This cross-sectional study was conducted in Chamran and Kosar hospitals in1397-1398 in Shiraz. The number of requested, consumed and cross-matched blood bags and the ratio of cross-match to transfusion in two consecutive years (before and after antibody screening) in Chamran and Kowsar hospitals were compared for one month and five months. The comparison of  ratio test with  Medcalc-7 statistical software was used for analysis.
 
Results
Prior to the antibody screening program, 585 blood bags were requested, 228 crossmatched and only 84 were transfused in Chamran Hospital. After antibody screening 554 requested  blood bags, 98 and 72 bags were crossmatched and transfused, respectively. The cross match -transfusion ratio was decresed  from 2.71 to 1.36 (p< 0.001, 95% CI: 31-25-41 / 98: 95%). Prior to the antibody screening program, out of 3595 requested blood bags, 3377 and 1468 bags were cross-matched and transfused in Kowsar Hospital, respectively. After antibody screening, out of 2183 requested blood bags, 1658 and 1157 bags were crossmatched and transfused, respectively. The cross - match to transfusion ratio was decreased (2.30 to 1.43) (p< 0.001 < 24/28/29/32: 95% CI) after antibody screening.
 
Conclusions 
Initiating antibody screening rationalized blood consumption. Therefore, it seems that it should be established in all hospitals, and coordination with insurance organizations should be done to allocate the budget and provide the required kits.
 
Key words: Screening, Blood, Hospitals
 
 
Received:  24 Jun 2020
Accepted: 14 Sep 2020
 

Correspondence: Kasraian L., Community Medicine Specialist. Associate Professor of Blood Transfusion Research Center, High Institute for Research and Education in Transfusion Medicine and Shiraz Blood Transfusion Center.
P.O.Box: 1153, Shiraz,  Iran. Tel: (+9871) 6273445; Fax: (+9871) 6264006
E-mail:lkasraian@yahoo.com
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

kasraian L, Afzal َ, Haghighat Z. The effectiveness of antibody screening program in improving blood consumption in two hospitals Kosar and Chamran in Shiraz, Iran. Sci J Iran Blood Transfus Organ 2021; 18 (1) :36-43
URL: http://bloodjournal.ir/article-1-1361-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 18, Issue 1 (Spring 2021) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه پژوهشی خون Scientific Journal of Iran Blood Transfus Organ
The Scientific Journal of Iranian Blood Transfusion Organization - Copyright 2006 by IBTO
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 39 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645