[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About us :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
News& Events::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Ethics & Permissions::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Indexing
                        
..
:: Volume 14, Issue 4 (Winter 2017) ::
Sci J Iran Blood Transfus Organ 2017, 14(4): 355-366 Back to browse issues page
Analysis of Basis of Civil Responsibility of the State Caused by the Supply of Contaminated Blood in Iranian Legal System and Shiite Jurisprudence
A. Amirhosseini , H. Mobayen
Keywords: Key words: Legal Liability, Government, Blood Transfusion, Jurisprudence
Full-Text [PDF 276 kb]   (3224 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (5520 Views)
Type of Study: Research | Subject: MSc in Law and Finance
Published: 2018/01/2
Full-Text:   (4689 Views)
References:
 
 
  1.  Hashemi A. The domain of civil liability. 1st ed. Tehran: Imam Sadeq University Publication; 2010. p. 11. [Persian]
  2. Ashtari M. [Civil Responsibility]. 1st ed. Tehran: Hoghoghdan Publication; 1996. p. 19.
  3. Mazeaud Henri. Lessons in civil law Volume II, New license, second year: Obligations, general theory, property, right of property and its dismemberments. Paris: Montchrestien; 1956. p. 374. [French]
  4. Bahrami Ahmadi H. Civil responsibility. 1st ed. Tehran: Mizan Publication; 2009. p. 28, 40-67. [Persian]
  5. Hossein Abadi A. Review and analysis of Article 7 of the Civil Liability Act. Theology and Law; 2006. p. 4. [Persian]
  6. Tajmiri A. Civil responsibility. 1st ed. Tehran: Afarineh Publication; 1996. p. 16. [Persian]
  7. Yazdanian A. Civil law. The scope of civil liability. 1st ed. Tehran: Adabestan Publication; 2000. p. 37.
  8. Le Tourneau Ph. La responsabilité civile, 3e éd., Paris: Dalloz; 1982, p. 10.
  9. Strack B. Droit Civil: Obligation. Paris: Libraires Technique; 1972. p. 27.
  10. Katouzian N. Non-contractual obligations, Indemnity, Civil liability. 6th ed. Tehran: Tehran University Publication; 2007. p. 179-213, 151, 161, 220. [Persian]
  11. Safaei H, Rahimi H. Civil liability (Non-contractual obligations). 1st ed. Tehran: Samt Publication; 2010. p. 66-87. [Persian]
  12. Barikloo   A.   Civil   liability.  1st ed.  Tehran:    Mizan
Publication; 2007. p. 43-55. [Persian]
  1. Navaei M. Liability due to illegitimate payment. 1st ed. Qom: Boostan Ketab Publication; 2009. p. 53. [Persian]
  2. Qasemzade M. Obligations and civil liability without contract. 7th ed. Tehran: Mizan Publication; 1999. p. 29. [Persian]
  3. Adib M. [Principal of Civil liability]. 2nd ed. Tehran: Miazn Publication; 2006. p. 56.
  4. Ansari M. Ketab Al-Makaseb. 2nd ed. Qom: Religious Press Institute; 2003. p. 277. [Persian]
  5. Araqi Z. La zarar and La zerar rule. Qom: Islamic Media Office; 1997. p. 137. [Arabic]
  6. Mousavi Bojnordi M. Jurisprudential rules. 3rd ed. Tehran: Orooj Publication; 1980. p. 11-12, 211. [Persian]
  7. Mousavi Khoei A. Misbah Al-Osul. Qom: Society of Seminary Teachers of Qom; 1989. p. 539. [Persian]
  8. Mohaghegh Damad M. Jurisprudential rules, Civil section. 11th ed. Tehran: Islamic Science Publishing Center; 2004. p. 158-64, 120, 178. [Persian]
  9. Salehi Mazandarani M. Civil liability of the State from the point of view of jurisprudence. Journal of Islamic Law 2011; 30: 8.
  10. Kazemi M. Responsibility for contaminated blood transfusion. Law Journal 2008; 37(3): 207-40.
  11. Abbasi M; Shekar Amraji A; Mohammadi S. A Comparative Study of the Responsibility for infected Bloods in the legal systems of Iran and Franc. Medical Law Journal 2009; 8(3): 61-92.
  12. Porghaher Doost Sh. Responsibility for contaminated blood transfusion. Dissertation MSc degrees of private law. Rasht: Islamic Azad University, Rasht branches; 2014. p. 42-54. [Farsi]
  13. Kazemi M; Roshan M, Roozbahani Sh. Civil liability of moral damage caused by AIDS and hepatitis which are transmitted by infected blood through, looking at the case called hemophilia. Medical Law Journal 2014; 30(8): 147-81.
  14. Karimi N. Liability without fault coming from the Transformation of infected Blood. Medical Law Journal 2010; 14(4): 153-91.
  15. Mohseni R. Civil liability due to contaminated blood transfusion in Iranian law. Dissertation MSc degrees of private law. Tehran: Shahid Bahonar University; 2015. [Farsi]
  16. Tabatabaei Motamani M. Comparative Administrative Law. Tehran: Samt Publication. 2nd ed; 2008. p. 412-4, 387. [Persian]
  17. Seifi J. The Hemophilia Case Study, A New Look at Civil Liability of the State in Iran's Judiciary. Journal of Legal Research 2006; 8: 267-89.
  18. Rostami V, Bahadori Jahromi A. Civil Liability of the State. Islamic Law Research Journal 2009; 29(10): 69-105.
  19. Toosi M. Estebsar. 4th ed. Tehran: Dar-Al-Kotob Elmiye; 1984. p. 872. [Persian]
  20. Mousavi Khoei A. Mabani Takmela Al-Minhaj. Najaf: Adab Press. p. 64. [Persian]
  21. Tabatabei Yazdi M. Al-Orva Al-Vosgha. 1st ed. Qom: Islamic Publishing Foundation; 2002. p. 452-4. [Persian]
  22. Golpayegani   M.   Dorr   Al-Manzood   fi   Ahkam Al-
Hodood. 1st ed. Qom: Dar Al-fekr; 1993. p. 398. [Arabic]
  1. Jabaei Al-Ameli Z. Masalek Al-Afham. Qom: Al-Mortazavi Press. 1989. p. 108, 162, 375. [Arabic].
  2. Ebn Manzoor M. Lasan Al-Arab. Beirut: Dar Al-Ehya Al-Toras Al-Ararbi; 1987. p. 18. [Arabic]
  3. Mahyar R. Abjadi Dictionary Arabic Farsi. Tehran: Islamic Publishers Office; 1989. p. 11.
  4. Najafi M. Jawaher Al-Kalam. 3rd ed. Qom: Dar Al-Olum Al-Islamiye; 1987. p. 60, 44. [Arabic]
  5. Toosi M. Al-Mabsoot. 2nd ed. Beirut: Al-Maktaba Al-Mortazaviye; 1972. p. 60. [Arabic]
  6. Makarem Shirazi N. Anwar Al-Fighaha. Qom: Ali Ibn Abitalib Institute; 1992. p. 192. [Arabic]
  7. Makarem Shirazi N. Jurisprudential rules. Qom: Ali Ibn Abitalib Institute; 1990. p. 194. [Arabic]
  8. Helli A. Sharaye Al-Islam. 2nd ed. Qom: Ismailiyan; 1987. p. 560. [Arabic]
  9. Mousavi Khoei A. Mustanad Al-Orva Al-Vosgha. Qom: Lotfi Publication; 1986. p. 249. [Arabic]
  10. Hosseini Sistani A. Minhaj Al-Salehin. 1st ed. Qom: Star Publication; 1994. p. 121. [Arabic]
  11. Hosseini Al-Marghi A. Al-Anavin. Qom: Islamic Publishing Foundation; 1996. p. 435. [Arabic]
 
  1. Mousavi Al-Khomeini. R. Tahrir Al-Vasile. 3rd ed. Tehran: Institute for Publication of Imam Khomeini; 1987. p. 190. [Arabic]
  2. Naraghi A. Avaed Al-Ayyam. 1st ed. Qom: Islamic Advertising Office; 1996. p. 44. [Arabic]
  3. Mousavi Al-Khomeini R. Makaseb Al-Muharrame. 2nd ed. Qom: Ismailiyan Publication; 1989. p. 98. [Arabic]
  4. Emami H. Civil law. 26th ed. Tehran: Islamiye Library; 2006. p. 393, 858. [Persian]
  5. Bahrami Ahmadi H. Jurisprudence rules; Brief of seventy-seven legal legal principles (with comparative study on law). 1st ed. Tehran: Imam Sadeq University Publication; 2009. p. 183-4. [Persian]
  6. Tabatabaei Yazdi M. Annotation on Makaseb. Qom: Ismailiyan Publication; 1958. p. 179. [Arabic]
  7. Rostami V, Sadeghi H, Soleymanian H. Civil liability of road managers for car accidents. Law Journal 2014 3(44): 363-81.
  8. Zargoosh M. Civil liability of the state. Tehran: Mizan Publication; 2010. p. 35, 292. [Persian]
  9. Qasemzade M. The bases of civil responsibility. 5th ed. Tehran: Mizan Publication; 2008. p. 234, 293-4.
  10. Katouzian N. Elementary course of civil law, Legal facts. Tehran: Dadgostar Publication. 1st ed; 2000. p. 109. [Persian]
  11. Badini H, Shabani Kondsari H, Radparvar S. Strict Liability: Foundations and Instances. Comparative Law Review 2012; 1(3): 19-36.
  12. Coleman J. Risks and Wrongs, Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Law. 1st ed. USA: Cambridge University Press. 1992. p. 328-9, 348.
  13. Dari-Mattiacci G, Parisi F. The Economics of Tort Law: A precis. The Elgar Companion to Law and Economics (2nd ed.), Edward Elgar Publishing 2006. George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 03-49.
  14. Katouzian N. Product Liability. 1st ed. Tehran: Tehran
University Publication; 2005. p. 8-9. [Persian]
  1. Shoarian E, Jabbari M. Civil liability of Police. 1st ed. Tabriz: Forouzesh Publication; 2009. p. 22. [Persian]
  2. Ansari B. Fundamentals of Civil Responsibility for Public Water Polluters. 1st ed. Tehran: Andishe Rafi; 2003. p. 66. [Persian]
  3. Forges JM. Responsabilité et indemnisation des préjudices résultant de contamination par transfusion sanguine, Reveu de droit sanitaire et social; 1992. p. 555.
  4. Debouy Ch. La responsabilité de l’administration français du fait de la contamination par le virus du sida. JCP; 1993. p. 31.
  5. Bergès N. La Sécurité des produits sanguins labiles, Gazette du Palais; 2006. no. 161.
  6. Mobayen H. Opposability theory in the basic of civil liability. 1st ed. Tehran: Imam Sadeq University Publication; 2012. p. 197. [Persian]
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sci J Iran Blood Transfus Organ 2018; 14(4): 355-366
Original Article
 
 
 

Analysis of Basis of Civil Responsibility of the State
Caused by the Supply of Contaminated Blood in Iranian
Legal System and Shiite Jurisprudence
 
Amirhosseini A.1, Mobayen H.2
 
1Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran. Iran
2Faculty of Law and Political Science, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
 
 
Abstract
Background and Objectives
After the transmission of AIDS and hepatitis to some hemophilic patient’s due to infected blood transfusions, the issue of civil liability of the state caused by the supply of blood contaminated in our legal system was seriously raised. The lawyers have mentioned several bases for the civil liability of the state (blood transfusion organization), including the basis of fault, strict liability (breach of safety obligation), equipment defect, and the basis for the not-harm. The purpose of this article is to describe the opposability as the basis for the state's liability in this field.
 
Materials and Methods
The research method in this paper is an analytical and descriptive method based on the analysis of legal provisions and the views of lawyers and jurists.
 
Results
The findings of this paper indicate that in the Shiiet jurisprudence, the Etlaf, Tasbib and Ghoror rules have been used to prove the state's responsibility for the supply of contaminated blood, which the Tasbib rule is more in harmony with this issue. In Iranian law, many lawyers have also tried to analyze this responsibility on the basis of strict liability.
 
Conclusions 
The theory of opposability as one of the theories expressed in the basis of civil responsibility, which relies on Shiite jurisprudence, can well justify the responsibility of the state for supply of contaminated blood, without the need to prove the fault or to be liable to the strict liability that is not acceptable in our legal system.
 
Key words: Legal Liability, Government, Blood Transfusion, Jurisprudence
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Received: 30 Mar 2017
Accepted: 25 Oct 2017
 
 

Correspondence: Amirhosseini A., PhD Student of Private Law. Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University.
Postal code: 1983969411, Tehran, Iran. Tel: (+9821) 22431758; Fax: (+9821) 22431681
E-mail: amin181170@chmail.ir
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Amirhosseini A, Mobayen H. Analysis of Basis of Civil Responsibility of the State Caused by the Supply of Contaminated Blood in Iranian Legal System and Shiite Jurisprudence. Sci J Iran Blood Transfus Organ 2017; 14 (4) :355-366
URL: http://bloodjournal.ir/article-1-1113-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 14, Issue 4 (Winter 2017) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه پژوهشی خون Scientific Journal of Iran Blood Transfus Organ
The Scientific Journal of Iranian Blood Transfusion Organization - Copyright 2006 by IBTO
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 39 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645